Skip to content

Diatribe: Censoring Dialogue But Not Images.


censorThis is the time of year when television watchers have little to get excited about.  The major networks are saving their new shows for the fall and cable seems to be airing “filler”.  Fortunately, most cable and satellite providers have begun to offer “on demand” services which, along with Netflix, etc., allow us to “binge watch” television series that we’ve heard about but have never seen.  A recent discovery at our house is Criminal Minds.

The CBS procedural drama made its debut almost nine years ago as part of the 2005 fall lineup and follows a team of FBI profilers from the Behavioral Analysis Unit.  Unlike other crime dramas, this one focuses on the criminal rather than the crime itself.  The writing is great and the cast is engaging.  Rather than watch the old episodes on DVD or via a streaming service, we’ve been watching them on basic cable network ION Television.

Sadly, ION doesn’t appear to have many advertisers, as the commercials that air during Criminal Minds always appear to be for other ION programs, but using a DVR usually lets us avoid them anyway.  The network, however, does something else that really grates on my nerves.  They randomly censor the episodes for language that someone, somewhere, deems unsuitable for us to hear, but not for the often extreme violence and gut-wrenching reality that we see as the Criminal Minds team address as they solve crimes.

criminal mindsWhile allowing viewers to watch brutal murders take place, gun fights resulting in lots of blood and many deaths, dismemberment and various types of torture, ION chooses to censor language deemed objectionable, for example, “This case is going to be a pain in the [SILENCE]”.  It seems to me that dialogue deemed suitable to air in prime time on a major network should be fine in re-runs on a basic cable network.

I’ll never understand why the powers that be find it necessary to censor language but not images.  Is it unreasonable to assume that the same viewers, probably children, that A&E doesn’t want to hear the word “ass” shouldn’t see blood, guts, torture, dismemberment and bullets flying like it’s perfectly normal?  As a parent, I’ve always felt that SEEING something objectionable was more damaging to a child than HEARING a “bad word”.  We can teach our children not to say things but we can’t teach them not to see things.  A mental image can last longer than a sound and kids rarely have nightmares about words that they hear.

I think censorship is wrong … even more so when it’s inconsistent.


Like this post? Follow the blog and get involved in discussions! Find “Follow via Email” on the right side of the page and click “Follow.”  Click on buttons at the end of each post to share on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and other social media sites, too!

Copyright © 2014


From → Diatribes

  1. It may not be too coincidental that we have discovered this older series as well. We have done this with other series we did not watch much as it is all new to us.


  2. thedogs'mother permalink

    One of my pet peeves!! I can mute the tv and now I have to change to a go to channel to avoid the images. And that is just for me! (children are 29, 29, 25)


Please LIKE and Share.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: