OVATION: GUEST POST – Regarding Kim Davis And Other County Clerks Whose Religious Beliefs Prevent Them From Fulfilling The Duties The Taxpayers Pay Them To Perform.
When civil servants, or public and government officials begin refusing to do the job for which they were hired (to serve the citizens) because of their religious beliefs, then they have constitutionally disqualified themselves from serving as a civil servant or a public or government official.
The debate is not one of marriage equality – that issue is over and settled. The debate now is whether or not an individual’s religious beliefs should be a disqualifying consideration for that individual to be hired into, or have their employment continued, as a civil servant or public or government official if those beliefs interfere with the performance of that person’s duties while being paid with tax dollars.
The Supreme Court, in last June’s landmark ruling in favor of nation-wide marriage equality, did not “redefine” marriage. This is a nation of laws. The Court’s responsibility is to interpret the United States Constitution – not a religion or ideology.
The preface of the United States Constitution contains 52 words, which delineate the six fundamental principles for which the entire Constitution is written to preserve.
People, particularly those who claim to have, but obviously have not read the Opinion of the Court, do not realize that aside from the 14th amendment and other Constitutional justifications cited in the Court’s decision regarding marriage equality, the decision also supported five of the six fundamental principles;
1.) To form a more perfect Union;
2.) Establish Justice;
3.) Insure domestic Tranquility;
4.) Promote the general Welfare;
5.) Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
The sixth principle is to provide for the common defense (spelled defence in the original text.)
Many of those who are protesting the Opinion of the Court have also not read or studied the United States Constitution.
The Constitution is readily available via Google. Anyone who is interested can download a PDF of the Court’s decision can CLICK HERE.
Dave Koch specializes in consultant services via on-site or his virtual office. His primary interests are start-ups, seed capitalization, corporate turnarounds and the development and implementation of earned income strategies for underperforming assets. He does a fair amount of writing, too. Other samples can be found at The Sextant.
Like this post? Follow the blog and get involved in discussions! Find “Follow via Email” on the right side of the page. There’s also an opportunity to follow on Twitter and/or LIKE our page on Facebook so you won’t miss a daily post. Click on buttons at the end of each post to share on other social media sites, too! Thanks for reading!
Copyright © 2015 www.DiatribesAndOvations.com